Maritime Financial Research


Latest Coverage

Maritime Credit Insight

Shipping bonds issuance momentum continues - October 2017


A growing number of shipping companies have taken advantage of the low interest rate environment and tapped the debt capital markets. This comes at a time when the availability of funds for the shipping industry is declining. We highlight four reasons behind the increase in high yield bond volumes coming from the shipping sector.

Source: Drewry Maritime Financial Research
Source: Drewry Maritime Financial Research


  1. Scarcity of funds from the banking sector. The regulatory pressures are forcing these institutions to increase impairments associated with shipping loans and thus more and more financial institutions are trying to limit their exposure to the highly volatile shipping sector. Banks with a more diversified portfolio and stronger balance sheet are able to navigate through the downturn and continue to support the industry. However, banking exposure is declining and shipowners are required to adjust in the new environment.
  2. Market rebound YTD, especially in the container shipping sector. The improving market dynamics help mitigate credit risk and can lead to credit rating upgrades. Year to date, large container shipping companies (primarily CMA CGM, Hapag-Lloyd) have issued five new lower priced bonds for an aggregate amount of USD 2.8bn equivalent.
  3. A low interest rate environment. Clearly the current situation provides an attractive context for shipping companies to refinance debt and push back the debt maturity profile. Persistently low interest rates challenge investors to hunt out yields and the high yield shipping bond market is a lucrative option. The average yield on dry bulk, tanker shipping and offshore bonds stands at 10%, 9.4% and 13% respectively. At the present time, the offshore sector offers the highest yields in Shipping, although it also comes with the highest risk.
  4. The covenant-lite structure of the securities and their unsecured nature. In the majority of cases, most shipping bonds are senior unsecured notes that lie at the bottom of the debt pecking order with incurrence covenants attached and not maintenance financial covenants. Shipping companies prefer that type of financing as they usually don’t have to pledge any collateral while investors are compensated with higher coupons for taking unsecured risk on the Company. On average, coupon stands at 5.6% and the average yield for investors at 6.2%.

Our assessment by sector

We have analysed a sample consisting of 61 shipping bonds outstanding with an aggregate amount of USD 28bn equivalent that filled our criteria: international bonds with a minimum size at issue of USD 100m, denominated in one of the major currencies (USD, EUR and GBP). Our Drewry Maritime Financial Research (DMFR) coverage accounts for more than 50% of these bonds.


The container shipping and port sectors account for 61% of total issues with tanker shipping bonds adding eight issues, gas shipping five, offshore eight and three more bonds raised by companies operating in the dry bulk space.

Source: Drewry Maritime Financial Research
Source: Drewry Maritime Financial Research

Bond primary issuance YTD is strong and we have recorded over USD 4bn equivalent in new issues. This is also supported by data from the Oslo Stock Exchange that suggest new bonds of NOK 45bn (USD 5.65bn) coming from the shipping and offshore sectors since the start of the year after pretty low volumes in 2016.


  • Container Shipping: The container shipping sector contributed the most of the new notes with 5 new bonds from CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd (two bonds each) and Global Ship Lease (GSL) and an aggregate amount of USD 2.8bn equivalent since the start of the year. Both companies have been attracting investor appetite hence all the new bonds were oversubscribed. This month alone, both CMA CGM and GSL raised EUR 500m and USD 360m respectively. GSL announced on 20 October 2017 the launch of a new USD 360m floating rate 2022 senior secured notes in order to redeem early the 2019 notes together with other debt facilities.
  • Gas Shipping: GasLog, Golar LNG and Golar LNG Partners from the Gas shipping sector have also tapped the bond market this year raising a total amount of USD 900m equivalent. Funds were used primarily for refinancing of debt obligations while the new bond from Golar Partners included a conversion into equity option. Euronav NV and Teekay Shuttle Tankers added USD 400m bringing the total amount YTD to USD 4.1bn equivalent.
Source: Drewry Maritime Financial Research
Source: Drewry Maritime Financial Research

Year to date perfomance

Year to date perfomance
  • Bonds issued by the companies that operate in the dry bulk and container shipping sectors have benefited the most YTD, in line with an improvement in freight rates for the sectors. The dry bulk sector has strengthened, with the BDI touching a three-year high. As a result, benchmark bonds from the sector with a large amount outstanding (Navios Holdings, Golden Ocean bonds) have rebounded YTD by a remarkable 25.3% on average. The rebound of the Navios notes had the most impact on the YTD return in the dry bulk sector, with Golden Ocean also climbing 17.4% during the same period.
  • The container shipping segment has also recognised gains since the start of the year, in line with the industry’s freight market upward trend. The sector, which comprises bonds from APMM, Hapag-Lloyd, CMA CGM and NOL (acquired by CMA CGM), is up 5.9% YTD. In the same manner, Port operators gained on average 3.7% YTD an improvement in port throughput growth figures for the same period.
  • Bond prices from notes issued by tanker companies have remained relatively unchanged on average, gaining 0.1% on since the start of the year. However, the volatility of specific securities was really high in line with the tanker freight market. Navios Maritime Acquisition shed 1.7% of the value, while Euronav’s new USD 150m 7.5% 2022 bond lost 3.5% since the issuance date. In a similar manner, the bonds issued by DHT Holdings, OSG and Eletson Holdings also came under pressure in the first nine months of the year while Teekay Corporation and Ship Finance International bonds recorded a positive return YTD.

Conclusion and takeaways

  • We believe that shipping bond volumes will continue to grow. It is a win-win situation as shipowners benefit from the unsecured nature (in the majority of cases) of the indenture and the ability to diversify their sources of funding at the current bank financing environment (although at a higher cost from traditional financing). On the other hand, bond investors are compensated with the higher yields offered by the industry betting on the credit risk of the issuer which comes down as market conditions improve, in our view.
  • The shipping sector provides a wide range of opportunities in the fixed income space. The credit risk spectrum for the shipping bonds ranges from CCC to BBB of the S&P ratings while yields can reach double digit figures. Volatility is not an issue for the industry’s bonds as is the case for global fixed income. The opportunity lies in early sector calls and accurate pricing of the risk premium investors are required to pay, in our view.


We at DMFR have been long on the dry bulk sector since June 2016 and also assigned an attractive view on the container shipping sector early this year. Both sectors have performed very well in terms of bond returns, in line with market improvement from rock bottom in 2016. Additionally, however, we believe that value can also be found in distressed sectors, for the right credit name.

Drewry Maritime Financial Research (DMFR) has 30 bonds under coverage.

FREE TRIAL to our Credit Research Service

Disclaimer: Important Information

Whilst the Company believes the information it uses for research is from sources believed to be reliable, the Company does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. The opinions and estimates included herein reflect the analysts’ views based on available information on the dates specified and these views may have changed without notice. Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific client. The information herein is published for clients only and is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by the client, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Company, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the Company, accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages, or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Company or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Company and its associates, their directors, officers and employees may have positions or other interests in, and may effect transactions in, securities mentioned herein. DFRS does not seek to do business with any of the companies mentioned other than sell them these reports. However, other related parts of Drewry Shipping Consultants Holdings Limited may seek to provide "advisory services or the sale of other group research products" to companies mentioned in this report.



The distribution of this email is governed by the UK Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 (the “FSMA”) and is restricted to qualified parties as defined by the FSMA. The distribution of this email may be restricted by rules and regulations in certain jurisdictions. Persons into whose possession the email may come are required to inform themselves about and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations in force in any jurisdiction in or from which it invests or receives or possesses this email and must obtain any consent, approval or permission required under the laws and regulations in force in such jurisdiction.


For US Investors

Drewry Financial Research Services (DFRS or the “Company”) is an independent research company and is not a registered investment adviser and is not acting as a broker dealer under any US federal or state securities laws. The Company does not provide individual investment advice or hold client money. As such, the Company is not required to be registered as an investment adviser.

Related News

Secondary offerings steal limelight in 2018, but will IPOs make a comeback in 2019?

Despite low levels of interest in shipping IPOs in the US over the last few years, listed shipping companies continue to raise money through secondary/additional offerings and bond offerings in the US market.

Drewry launches special report: Hyundai Merchant Marine (HMM) - what lies ahead?

Drewry Financial Research has conducted an in-depth assessment of the issues facing HMM and their future prospects with consideration given to current and anticipated future market conditions.


$6bn: The combined value of container shipping industry investments we have advised on since 2010.


$20bn: The value of financing projects we have provided commercial due diligence advice for in port M&A since 2010.


The number of countries in which our advisors have completed assignments since 2005.


Our advisors have been involved in over 400 port assignments over the past 10 years.
Latest Coverage
Our equity research service provides our clients with a range of report formats and supporting resources for the companies we cover.

Market understanding

Investment analysis based on a clear understanding of the market at both an industry and sector level.

Quality insights

Our analysts have access to one of the most up-to-date, comprehensive and reliable sources of market insight.


Type of Report



Drewry Maritime Financial Insight October 2019

Maritime Financial Insight18 Oct 2019PDF

Golden Ocean - Gearing up for the top spot

Financial Research Report12 Oct 2019PDF

ICTSI - Outlook 2019

Financial Research Report04 Oct 2019PDF

Scorpio Bulkers - Company update - September 2019

Financial Research Report26 Sep 2019PDF

HPHT - Outlook 2019

Financial Research Report19 Sep 2019PDF

Maritime Financial Insight - June 2019

Maritime Financial Insight26 Jun 2019PDF

ICTSI 1Q19 - Result update

Financial Research Report17 Jun 2019PDF

Diana, Star Bulk and Golden Ocean - Is the worst behind them?

Financial Research Report11 Jun 2019PDF

Cosco Shipping Ports 1Q19 - Result update

Financial Research Report07 Jun 2019PDF

Pacific Basin - Company update - May 2019

Financial Research Report22 May 2019PDF

View more