MENU
Search
Login

Maritime Financial Research

Overview

Latest Coverage

Model Portfolio - Jul 20

In 2016, Drewry Maritime Financial Research (DMFR) launched a model portfolio - selecting stocks within the global maritime space to ensure a balanced approach to managing risk in a low return environment.


Recommended stocks are hand-picked based on the fundamentals of each entity, coupled with near-term triggers. The objective of the model portfolio is to generate optimum returns in conjunction with moderate risk.

DMFR Model Portfolio - Performance since inception
DMFR Model Portfolio - Performance since inception

July 2020

  • During the period (28 October 2019 to 30 June 2020), our portfolio lost about ~36% in value while Dow Jones Global Shipping Index (DJSGH) lost ~29%. The benchmark MSCI index slid about 1.3%, and shipping equities in this period were hit hard in 1H20 largely due to demand-side constraints. Meanwhile, key geopolitical risks continue, including the worsening ties between the US and China.
  • Our previous edition released in November, in terms of allocation, weighed heavy on dry bulk shipping (33%) and LNG shipping (29%) to benefit from expected freight rate recovery after a trough in the market. On a weighted basis, LNG stocks returned -11.8% and dry bulk stocks returned -10% in this period. Gaslog (GLOG) tumbled the most in this period, 81% in absolute terms and 9.7% on a weighted basis. Similarly, Star Bulk (SBLK) lost the most in the dry bulk sector, erasing 42% value in absolute terms, translating into a fall of 6.8% on a weighted basis.
  • D/S Norden (DNORD) lost the least among all the stocks in the portfolio, in terms of absolute return at 9%. Due to business-segment diversification, DNORD was the least impacted fundamentally, owing to the strength in the tanker segment and dry operator segment.
  • Star Bulk retrofitted its entire fleet with scrubbers and deployed it in the spot market. The cape-dominated fleet was hit hard when Baltic Capesize Index (BACI) dipped to sub-zero levels as operators struggled to meet breakeven. The contracting spread between HSFO and LSFO did not help either, and the company took a break from paying dividends as its cash dipped below the threshold levels. While the full impact of the above-mentioned factors are yet to be seen on the financials with 2Q20 results awaited, the stock already plunged 42%, translating into a weighed return of -6.8%.
  • Despite global slowdown and restricted trade, the S&P 500 and MSCI saw a stable performance at 0.3% and -1.3% in our overview period respectively. The shipping industry, however, bore the full brunt of the bearish market sentiment. The DJGSH lost more than 29%. However, DMFR’s portfolio was volatile as all the 12 stocks in the portfolio contributed negatively, bringing the total return for the portfolio to -36%.
  • DMFR’s model portfolio doubled up between February 2016 and November 2019. However, over the last nine months, the total return since inception has come down to 27.8%, still maintaining in the positive territory. On an annualised basis, the DMFR portfolio has returned more than 5.73% since inception, compared with 8% generated by MSCI and -8.47% by DJSGH.
  • We maintain our top pick: Star Bulk carriers, mainly due to the strong asset base and positive market outlook for dry bulk shipping in 2H20. Star Bulk represents significant upside from the current levels and hence has been assigned a weight of 15% in our portfolio.

Archive of Model Portfolio Updates

October 2019

  • During the period (13 March 2019 to 28 October 2019), our portfolio gained a substantial ~39% in value while Dow Jones Global Shipping Index (DJSGH) gained ~14%.
  • The benchmark MSCI index rose by a mere 5.5%. Shipping equities in the period have seen a rally in the last couple of months largely due to supply-side discipline.
  • Key geopolitical risks remain including, US-China trade negotiations, ‘no deal’ Brexit and US sanctions on Iran and Venezuela.

March 2019

  • During the period (4 October 2018 to 15 March 2019), our portfolio lost 12.2% in value and the Dow Jones Global Shipping Index (DJGSH) lost 14.7% in value.
  • Shipping equities have retracted sharply owing to the seasonal weakness in the bulk and container trades, and the persisting uncertainty in the macro business environment. As a result, the portfolio lagged behind the benchmark index MSCI, which declined 1.8% during the same period.
  • Weakness in stock performance also attributed to the sell-side pressure created during December 2018.
  • The portfolio modestly outperformed the sectoral benchmark the DJGSH by 2.6% during the period. On an annualised basis, the DMFR portfolio has returned 12.7% since its inception (February 2016) compared with 11.7% generated by the MSCI and -5.6% by the DJGSH.

October 2018

  • Our model portfolio is down 2.5% in the period starting 1 March 2018 to 4 October 2018, but continues to negotiate headwinds – as evident by the 6.3% outperformance against Bloomberg’s BI SHIP.
  • In this same period, however, the portfolio lagged behind the global benchmark – the MSCI World Index (up 1.2%) – as shipping stocks across the board, with the exception of the tanker sector, weakened. The allocation to stocks of large dry bulk carriers and tanker operators helped minimise losses.
  • We have modified our strategy to increase exposure to the tanker shipping sector to 47% from 11% earlier as we believe the tanker shipping market has bottomed out.
  • In terms of portfolio concentration, we have increased the number of stocks in our portfolio from 10 to 13 as we now include more stocks, especially in the tanker and LNG sectors.

March 2018

  • Our model portfolio gained 2.8% between November 2017 and February 2018, outperforming its sector-specific benchmark – Bloomberg’s BI SHIP (down 4.5%) – as a result of the rebound in the dry bulk and LPG shipping stocks. Meanwhile, the performance of the DMFR model portfolio lagged behind that of the global benchmark – the MSCI World Index (up 5.2%) – as we witnessed a disproportionate correction in global shipping stocks since the start of 2018. Our timely increase in allocation to gas shipping stocks benefited the portfolio as value-buying emerged, particularly in the LPG shipping space.
  • In November 2017, we increased our allocation of LPG shipping stocks from 7% to 16% on the back of improving demand-supply fundamentals.
  • The overall LPG vessel fleet is likely to expand 5% in 2018, compared with the average annual growth of 16% in the last two years. We had been confident on the coaster segment since the middle of last year, and our view is substantiated by the increased rates for smaller vessels. Download March 2018 Report

October 2017

  • Our model portfolio gained 11.1% between July and October 2017, outperforming its sector-specific benchmark – Bloomberg’s BI SHIP (up 5.2%), and also MSCI – the global benchmark index (up 6.8%).
  • This out-performance was a result of the continued recovery in the dry bulk and liner shipping sectors. We have maintained our exposure to liner stocks although we have reshuffled the allocation based on valuations.
  • Our increased allocation to gas shipping stocks benefited the portfolio as value-buying emerged, particularly in the LPG shipping space. Meanwhile, crude tanker operators continued to reel under pressure and the stocks under our coverage declined since our last update in July. Download October Report

June 2017

  • Our model portfolio gained 3.2% from March 2017 to June 2017, clearly outperforming its sector-specific benchmark, Bloomberg’s BI SHIP (down 2.5%), while being lower than MSCI, the global benchmark index (up 4.6%).
  • This outperformance was a result of our larger allocation to container shipping companies and port operators. However, at average P/B valuations of 2x for liner companies, most of the positive developments are in the price, and hence we believe it is time to book profit in names such as Maersk and OOIL, which have led the rally in the liner space.
  • We also trimmed our exposure to port operators in view of the surge in share prices especially ICTSI, which we downgraded to Neutral in May 2017.

February 2017

  • First year’s performance, Model Portfolio returns 38%. Download full report
  • In 2Q16, we made a tactical shift to increase allocation to the dry bulk sector as we upgraded it to Neutral, backing our conviction of the bottom in the dry bulk market. We downgraded the tanker segment considering its large orderbook, significant dividend cuts ahead and were also discouraged by stagnant asset prices despite healthy freight rates. Our conviction call for 2016, “Long dry bulk, short tankers” generated the highest alpha.
  • In 3Q16, our portfolio construct was geared for higher risk and we increased our allocation to the dry bulk sector to 42% as we expected the upward trend in stock prices to resume after a period of consolidation in 2Q16. The trade played out handsomely as our portfolio generated a return of 40% between October 2016 and February 2017.
  • Our portfolio defied a terrible year for the industry to produce a 38% return in our first year out. The model portfolio markedly outperformed the benchmark indices, BISHIPGP Index (Bloomberg Intelligence Marine Shipping Index, 14%) and MSCI World Index(19%) by a big margin.
  • For 2017, lowering allocation to dry bulk stocks; increasing weightage on container trade. We have reduced our allocation to the dry bulk segment to 31% from 42%. The value play is over in our view and we believe stocks could be at the risk of “too soon too fast” in the near term. Conversely, we believe that the worst is over for the container shipping and we see higher returns for the sector in 2017-18. We have increased the allocation to the sector from 8% to 27%. The port sector is another major constituent of our model portfolio for 2017 as world trade recovery gathers steam and earnings remain resilient for our portfolio constituents.
  • We are Neutral on gas shipping as we believe the stocks are trading in a fair territory, while we maintain our Unattractive stance on tankers.

October 2016

  • Our model portfolio outperformed key benchmark indices from June to October, although it is still down 6% from February 2016. The portfolio generated annualized returns of 15.7% during the four-month period starting from 16 June 2016.
  • We continue to stick to our thesis that dry bulk names will be the outperformers in 2017, and have added Star Bulk Carriers because of its high spot exposure and large Capesize fleet.
  • We have increased allocation to the Port sector as the global throughput growth is stabilising and hence earnings will remain resilient in our view; we have included China-COSCO Ports and ICTSI.

June 2016

  • We made a tactical shift to increase allocation to the Dry Bulk sector in June 2016 as we believed the bottom had been reached early in the year. Meanwhile, we downgraded the Tanker segment to Neutral on increasing vessel supply.
  • We reshuffled our portfolio to play the recovery in the Dry Bulk shipping sector albeit from a very low base, and believed that the beaten-down Dry Bulk names could provide superior risk-adjusted returns.

About our Model Portfolio

In 2016, Drewry Maritime Financial Research (DMFR) launched a model portfolio - selecting stocks within the global maritime space to ensure a balanced approach to managing risk in a low return environment.


Recommended stocks are hand-picked based on the fundamentals of each entity, coupled with near-term triggers. The objective of the model portfolio is to generate optimum returns in conjunction with moderate risk.
It is important to note that shipping is a high-beta sector; it is therefore not uncommon for shipping stocks to under-perform or out-perform the financial markets by a wide alpha.

 

Related News

Drewry launches COVID-19 special report assessing the financial health of the container shipping industry

In this 50-page special report, Drewry’s investment research team updates its independent assessment of the financial health of the box shipping industry. The full report is now available to purchase online.

Secondary offerings steal limelight in 2018, but will IPOs make a comeback in 2019?

Despite low levels of interest in shipping IPOs in the US over the last few years, listed shipping companies continue to raise money through secondary/additional offerings and bond offerings in the US market.

6

$6bn: The combined value of container shipping industry investments we have advised on since 2010.

20

$20bn: The value of financing projects we have provided commercial due diligence advice for in port M&A since 2010.

54

The number of countries in which our advisors have completed assignments since 2005.

400

Our advisors have been involved in over 400 port assignments over the past 10 years.
Latest Coverage
Our equity research service provides our clients with a range of report formats and supporting resources for the companies we cover.

Market understanding

Investment analysis based on a clear understanding of the market at both an industry and sector level.

Quality insights

Our analysts have access to one of the most up-to-date, comprehensive and reliable sources of market insight.

Company

Type of Report

Date

Download

How BW LPG stock compares with FFAs and asset prices

Event Update01 Oct 2020PDF

ZIM - Is the timing right for an IPO?

Event Update23 Sep 2020PDF

Lacklustre returns for product tankers despite record earnings

Event Update18 Sep 2020PDF

Euronav NV - Stock price decoupling from fundamentals

Event Update11 Sep 2020PDF

HHLA - Mid year outlook 2020

Financial Research Report09 Sep 2020PDF

Wind turbine installation vessel business - Reprieve or a debt trap for Scorpio Bulkers?

Event Update04 Sep 2020PDF

Teekay Tankers - Strengthening the balance sheet is priority

Financial Research Report28 Aug 2020PDF

DP World moves further ahead into vertical integration

Event Update26 Aug 2020PDF

AP Moller-Maersk 2Q20 - Result update

Financial Research Report20 Aug 2020PDF

Star Bulk - Is the worst behind us?

Financial Research Report20 Aug 2020PDF

View more