ao link
MENU
Search
Login
Drewry Maritime Advisors
Maritime Research

China cuts steel production to tackle pollution

China has announced a 50% cut to existing steel production. This is an effort to curb the expected rise in pollution in the winter when electricity demand peaks.

China has been trying to address its burgeoning pollution problem since the past couple of years. However, a fast growing demand for steel and power has prevented China from taking any major steps to tackle pollution. The Chinese government is aware that taking on power production will not be possible because to meet the winter demand for power, the country will have to depend on coal, at least for the time being. Meanwhile, it has announced to cut steel production, which could reduce the iron ore demand by 28 million tonnes or 33 Capesizes, in our base case. For detailed outlook, please refer to Drewry’s quarterly report, Dry Bulk Forecaster.

The Chinese government’s recent push to cut down on steel production over the next five months (November to March) to curb pollution is expected to affect 28 prefecture level cities, as shown in the map. These cities together produced 76.4 million tonnes of steel in 2016, out of the 262.3 million tonnes that China produced in those five months. These 28 cities are the ones most affected by pollution in China and have substantial steel-producing units.

 

There has been a 5% growth in China’s steel production in the first half of this year. Assuming a similar growth could have happened in the next five months, the 76.4 million tonnes of steel that these cities produced in the same period last year could have reached to 80.3 million tonnes for the five-month period ending March 2018.

Planned steel production cut in 28 cities

Planned steel production cut in 28 cities

Iron ore imports for 28 cities (million tonnes)

Iron ore imports for 28 cities (million tonnes)

Of this, China aims to cut 50% of the production (40 million tonnes), though we think this is a bit too ambitious target to achieve given the existing demand for steel in the country. In the past, China has tried similar steps without any visible success. We believe a 25% cut is still achievable in which case there could be a reduction of 20 million tonnes of steel production which, as a result, would require 28 million tonnes of iron ore.


If, however, China indeed cuts the production level by 50%; this could affect a 40 million tonnes of reduction in steel production resulting into a contraction of 56 million tonnes of iron ore imports to the country.


In our view, Brazil's contribution in iron-ore exports to China will remain intact considering the long-term contracts between Vale and Chinese companies. However, Australia could lose its share to the extent China reduces its imports. Assuming the proposed volume cut would have moved between Hedland and Qingdao in a 180k dwt Capesize, a 25% steel production cut would mean that 33 Capesize vessels would lose employment.

Unemployed Capesize

Unemployed Capesize

In case China goes ahead and actually cuts steel production by 50%; Dry bulk market would lose 56 million tonnes of iron ore thereby removing 66 Capesize vessels of their employment for the mentioned five months.

Key Contacts

Rahul Sharan

Rahul Sharan

We use cookies to remember if you are logged into this website and provide you with the best online experience. By continuing to use our website you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click on this banner message if you would like to find out more.
Cookie Settings